Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Lost in the fog...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by mrcoachdude View Post
    I kind of wonder what it would be like to have:

    1- SM
    2 - AW
    3 - TB
    4 - WE
    5 - JP


    How about next year except...who would be the 2.....
    Well, didn't we pretty much already see that group of players last year?

    1- SM
    2- AW
    3- CR
    4- TB
    5- WE

    ...and that team went 16-15. I like Prosser a lot...but was replacing Roberts with Prosser really going to make us a dramatically better team?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ER3 View Post
      Well, didn't we pretty much already see that group of players last year?

      1- SM
      2- AW
      3- CR
      4- TB
      5- WE

      ...and that team went 16-15. I like Prosser a lot...but was replacing Roberts with Prosser really going to make us a dramatically better team?

      To answer that quickly...NO



      My biggest peave right now is all the wasteful and rdiculous dribbling from side to side 30 ft from the basket and the fact that we have guards that seem to need screens set for them 35 ft from the basket just to clear space so they can dribble more!

      I'm beyond sick of the non offensive offense or whatever it is we are supposedly running out there...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BradleyBrave View Post
        Never been an advocate of an in-season change. Nothing is gained IMO.

        Coaching last night? I don't know. I don't think the tech did, but we made some really bad decisions and couldn't get a stop in the last minute or in overtime. JL didn't miss the shots or the FT's or didn't play bad defense, but he recruited all of the guys who did. As I said in another thread, I don't think the overall frustration is with one game, one tech, or even one bad season. More, it's the body of work and way the program appears to be trending. At some point the steward of the program has to be held accountable for the results on the floor. If saying that makes me a hater with an agenda, so be it. I think you know I am not.
        I couldn't have said this better myself. I thought the coaching in that game was pretty good, especially in the overtime. But it comes down to recruiting, the trends and the lack of confidence in the players. It's not all attributed to coaching, but everyone has to take the blame from the AD to the coaches on downward for not being able to find ways to win at least a few conference games by now.

        I don't know which way the adminstration will go after the season is over, but their obviously needs to be a lot of soul searching once the season is over. But I will support whatever decision they make.

        Comment


        • #34
          Will we even get to 50?



          Well at least Prosser and Warren have shown up today on the stat sheet

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by mrcoachdude View Post
            I kind of wonder what it would be like to have:

            1- SM
            2 - AW
            3 - TB
            4 - WE
            5 - JP


            How about next year except...who would be the 2.....
            Lemon has the skills, with proper "reigning in" of his questionable decision making, he's the one guy coming back that has a chance to expand his offensive game.

            Don't have a clue about Abell, but he at least fits the prototype of a 2.

            Comment

            Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

            Collapse
            Working...
            X