If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
In the last two games, the "2 Big" lineup (JP, WE, AT, & MK) has dramatically outperfromed the "4 Small" lineup:
CU: 4S (-19), 2B (+6) = 25 point differential
EU: 4S (-8 ), 2B (+5) = 13 point differential
In my opinion, it's hard to understand why we didn't see AT play against Evansville and MK get some playing time before WE fouled out. I'm very ready to see a head coaching change ... either in philosophy or in person. I can barely stomach watching these games when JL goes 4 small.
Last edited by Dallas Brave; 01-24-2011, 11:12 AM.
It also does not help that we insist on playing the same D that UNI played against us the S16 year (leave an unproven shooter JJ open to hit a ton of 3's)
For me personally, I was really enjoying the lineup at the end of the game. With the seniors and Egolf fouled out, I felt like I was watching the future, and I did not feel disappointed in what I saw.
Lets face it, one big player on the floor does not work as the opposing team has at least 2 big defenders to stop our 1 player inside, J.P. is a freshman and you cannot expect a freshman to be exposed like that which is why I said J.P. contributes when he has help inside with another big, stats do not lie , ISU will kill us on the boards because of their size and leaping ability.
I didn't do individual +/- as I wanted to focus on the productivity of the "4 small" vs "2 big" lineup.
But, since the bigs are JP, WE, AT, and MK, the vast majority of the "2 big" combo time has gone to WE and JP as a tandem. All of MK's time (which is only a few minutes) over the last two games has been as part of a 2 big combo. AT had a little of both I believe against CU and then, for whatever coaching reasons JL employs, never saw the floor against EU.
Comment