Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Danny Granger question...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Danny Granger question...

    Here's an interesting thought....

    Danny Granger just tweeted this........

    "Someone asked me why I wear#33. Its because when I was 9 or so scottie
    pippen reached up and touched my hand at a bulls game. Been #33 since"



    Hmmm....but Danny was #14 when he was Bradley.......so my question is why wasn't Danny #33 when he was at Bradley??

    I think I might know the answer....mouse over below to see.......

    Well, I believe the answer is two-fold......
    and it's because the uniform #33 has been retired TWICE by Bradley...
    Once for Hersey Hawkins and once for Bob Carney....


    Here are the players who have worn #33 while at Bradley...

    Hersey Hawkins
    Anthony Webster
    Robert Jenkins
    Sam Allen
    Billy Gay
    Ernie Thompson
    bob Carney
    Buford Heidenreich
    Ed Wodka
    Gene Morse
    Dick Wickstrand
    Bob Garber


  • #2
    ... Because Sam Singh was already wearing #33 before Grainger arrived, of course.

    Comment


    • #3
      lol I knew the answer.......forgot about Carney though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ph View Post
        ... Because Sam Singh was already wearing #33 before Grainger arrived, of course.
        awesome. That is all.
        Sungani umoyo womseko na wokonda waumbiri anznga.

        Comment


        • #5
          Probably because only loyal Braves were allowed to wear that number.
          What part of illegal don't you understand?

          Comment


          • #6
            Who the he!! is Danny Granger and why does anyone care about him......go away.....move closer to home.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chico View Post
              Probably because only loyal Braves were allowed to wear that number.
              This is known prior to any disloyal act? Maybe that information should be used during the recruiting process!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BSSFan#1 View Post
                This is known prior to any disloyal act? Maybe that information should be used during the recruiting process!
                Stealing from OOB, C'mon Man. Obvious I was being sarcastic with 33 being once worn by The Hawk and Joe Allen.
                What part of illegal don't you understand?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Chico View Post
                  Stealing from OOB, C'mon Man. Obvious I was being sarcastic with 33 being once worn by The Hawk and Joe Allen.
                  Not here enough to know what I've stolen.
                  I knew you were being sarcastic, that is why I added .

                  Sorry if I wasn't clear about that.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't know who that is

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Who's on first?

                      Comment

                      Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X