Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Vote : Danny Adams Color Analyst

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Was at the first 3 games so I couldn't comment on DA's job performance. But I did hear the first 15 minutes of tonight's game and thought he was very good.
    What part of illegal don't you understand?

    Comment


    • #17
      Knowing you can't please everyone all the time, a 70% approval rating so far for DA early in his radio career as a basketball analyst is pretty good.

      With an approval rating like this, Aaron Schock better watch out!
      BUilding for the Future

      Comment


      • #18
        I like his comments during the games although he does talk a little fast at times. He needs to work out coming up with better questions for the after the game interviews. The "talk about" to start of a question is getting old and needs to have some bette, not as vague, questions

        Comment


        • #19
          My only suggestion for DA is a simple adage that teachers, coaches and other presenters need to adapt to be effective:

          If you can't say it in six words or less, don't say it at all.

          Not a hard and fast rule, but one that can be especially helpful.

          Comment


          • #20
            Got to listen to DA do the games this weekend. In game color is OK. Much better than I anticipated.

            Post game is not good. We really enjoy the ride home and DA has a LOT of work to do there. Questions just aren't good and analysis is just over the top positive.

            Listen, I am an optimistic person, but call a spade a spade. Good honest analysis year after year is one big reason why we have smart educated fan base.

            In game color...ave to good. Post game questions and analysis...LOTS of work to do.
            Get Well Massive Mike! "Once a Brave always a Brave!"

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Double D View Post
              Got to listen to DA do the games this weekend. In game color is OK. Much better than I anticipated.

              Post game is not good. We really enjoy the ride home and DA has a LOT of work to do there. Questions just aren't good and analysis is just over the top positive.

              Listen, I am an optimistic person, but call a spade a spade. Good honest analysis year after year is one big reason why we have smart educated fan base.

              In game color...ave to good. Post game questions and analysis...LOTS of work to do.
              Even on the national level, IMO, there are not many smart questions by so-called sportscasters. How many times have you heard, "what did this game mean to you?" During the game DA is not afraid to call a spade a spade and tell it like it is IHO.
              What part of illegal don't you understand?

              Comment


              • #22
                Dave Reynolds has a story on Danny Adams this morning......

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by RaiderOfBradley View Post
                  As I was fortunate enough to win the "Bids For The Braves" auction and do the second half of the Quincy game with DS and DA.
                  I bet that was very fun! I was thinking of bidding but did not.

                  Dave always does a great job. DA is doing fine and will continue to improve. There is a HUGE learning curve (and comfort level) in that job. Da - Best of luck!
                  It's not Business, It's Personal

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    [QUOTE=Air Petey;200046]I bet that was very fun! I was thinking of bidding but did not.



                    And the ENTIRE BU nation thanks you for that.......

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by squirrelgotdead View Post
                      My only suggestion for DA is a simple adage that teachers, coaches and other presenters need to adapt to be effective:

                      If you can't say it in six words or less, don't say it at all.

                      Not a hard and fast rule, but one that can be especially helpful.
                      Six words or less?!? The rules was 15 itself!

                      Seriously though, I wish that's how presenters for meetings at work went about things Maybe I'll suggest it...as concisely as possible.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by BUBrave28 View Post
                        Six words or less?!? The rules was 15 itself!

                        Seriously though, I wish that's how presenters for meetings at work went about things Maybe I'll suggest it...as concisely as possible.
                        Lol.

                        Unfortuntely, sound Six Sigma process reasoning indicates that sentence structure must be defined to satisfy voice of the customer critical characteristics and critical customer requirements of all present and non-present actual, potential, and theoretical stakeholders to ensure that no extraneous change management operations will be required thereby ensuring that the projects in question can proceed smoothly and without delay allowing The Company to experience game-changing economic profits.

                        Wait. What?
                        My sports blog.

                        Comment

                        Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                        Collapse
                        Working...
                        X