Plus/Minus vs. Northern Illinois

[shaunguth]

Here are the net +/- point differential for each player while they were on the floor and for each combination of players that were on the floor. The starters for the game are highlighted.


__+10__Dodie Dunson (34:50)

___+7__Sam Maniscalco (31:41)

___+5__Jordan Prosser (20:14)

___+4__Will Egolf (16:2

___+3__Andrew Warren (36:02)

___-2__Dyricus Simms-Edwards (34:12)

___-2__Walt Lemon Jr. (14:2

___-2__Milos Knezevic (3:26)

___-9__Anthony Thompson (8:39)



__+10__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Warren__Prosser (11:2

___+2__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Warren__Egolf (11:36)

___+2__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Egolf__Prosser (1:12)

____0__Dunson__Lemon__Warren__Egolf__Prosser (1:40)

____0__Maniscalco__Dunson__Lemon__Knezevic__Prosse r (1:32)

____0__Maniscalco__Lemon__Warren__Egolf__Prosser (1:22)

____0__Maniscalco__Lemon__Warren__Knezevic__Thomps on (1:14)

____0__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Lemon__Warren__Egolf (0:3

____0__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Lemon__Prosser (0:34)

____0__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Lemon__Warren__Prosser (0:30)

____0__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Lemon__Warren__Thompson (0:17)

____0__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Warren__Thompson (0:09)

___-2__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Lemon__Knezevic__Prosser (0:40)

___-4__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Lemon__Warren__Thompson (6:01)

___-5__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Warren__Prosser__Thompson (1:07)

[Da Coach]

Great work shaunguth.
Not a lot of surprises in those stats. Looks like we need the seniors on the floor as much as possible.

[ph]

Am I reading this right? If I attempt a + - projected for 40 minutes

2 bigs would mean appx +80

Meanwhile the great looking +10 in 11 mins really only projects to be a +40

[shaunguth]

Am I reading this right? If I attempt a + - projected for 40 minutes

2 bigs would mean appx +80

Meanwhile the great looking +10 in 11 mins really only projects to be a +40

Unless those two bigs are Prosser and Thompson.....then it would be -200.

[Buesch N Chips]

Two game total

AW - 15
SM - 15
WE - 11
DD - 10
WL - 8
JP - 7
DSE - 6
MK - 4
AT - (-7)

[amckillip]

___+2__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Dunson__Egolf__Prosser (1:12)

____0__Dunson__Lemon__Warren__Egolf__Prosser (1:40)

____0__Maniscalco__Dunson__Lemon__Knezevic__Prosse r (1:32)

____0__Maniscalco__Lemon__Warren__Egolf__Prosser (1:22)

____0__Maniscalco__Lemon__Warren__Knezevic__Thomps on (1:14)

___-2__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Lemon__Knezevic__Prosser (0:40)

___-5__Maniscalco__Simms-Edwards__Warren__Prosser__Thompson (1:07)

Am I reading this right? If I attempt a + - projected for 40 minutes

2 bigs would mean appx +80

Meanwhile the great looking +10 in 11 mins really only projects to be a +40

I get a weighted average of all 2 big men sets to be a -33 point differential per 40.

Just JP and WE gives + 22 per 40.

Just some info.

[Buesch N Chips]

I get a weighted average of all 2 big men sets to be a -33 point differential per 40.

Just JP and WE gives + 22 per 40.

Just some info.

I think the 2-big sample size is a wee bit small for drawing any conclusions whatsoever, but it is an alarming number.

[amckillip]

I think the 2-big sample size is a wee bit small for drawing any conclusions whatsoever, but it is an alarming number.

Agreed completely. I'm going to throw Shaun's numbers in a database and it should be cool to see what happens throughout the season.

[shaunguth]

I think the 2-big sample size is a wee bit small for drawing any conclusions whatsoever, but it is an alarming number.

The player-combinations' numbers are incredibly small at this point, otherwise there are a couple of combinanations that project out to 120+ per 40 and a coupld other combinations that project out exactly the opposite.