If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
I think this point is valid. As much as we all would love a towering line-up, there are major disadvantages. I look at Illinois who starts 7'1, 6'10, 6'9 and am convinced that they are the slowest team I have ever watched. They usually sub one of the bigs out in the first 2 minutes because it is extremely rare to find a Kevin Durant prototype who is 6'10, but has the quickness to guard a 2 or a 3.
I love the idea of a taller lineup, but I think it is more important to get the best players on the floor, and with AW, TB, DSE, and DD being #1-4 (assuming SM is injured), I can't imagine going big with TB at the 3 for more than a few minutes.
I am much less concerned about Taylor guarding a 3 as I am Will sticking on a 4.
AT's strength gains are the obvious result of a tremendous amount of work.
May not be enough overall to result in many minutes, but you can no longer say he lacks any work ethic.
Tweet
Comment