Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

sporting news -very preseason top 25

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by SycamoreFanatic View Post
    Butler is "pre-season" ranked a little too high. They won't be nearly as good a team without Hayward and unless you are drinking the kool-aid probably won't advance in the Dance, assuming that they even make it (remember, Horizon League)? They are "one & done" on the national stage (final 4). Good coach, good team, but let's be serious.....................not a national contender anymore......................very similar to Creighton, usually contending for conference championship but not much punch beyond.
    Let's be serious that Butler is a mid-major powerhouse that has built a winning foundation nearly beat National Champion Duke.
    Why wouldn't they have a chance to contend next year?
    Besides, it was Hayward who missed that easy half-court shot that could have won it for Butler last year.
    I think they'll keep bringing in good recruits that fit their style of play.
    If Butler doesn't make the Sweet 16, I'll be shocked.

    Comment


    • #17
      I just hope Butler remains the no. 1 NCAA basketball team in Ind.

      Comment


      • #18
        Butler is the new Gonzaga. What's so hard to understand about that?

        Comment


        • #19
          Someone will have to agree with me that Butler wasn't expected to do what they did...and they wouldn't be able to do what they did again....they got hot and made a run....they wouldn't beat most of the teams they did consistently....they weren't the 2nd best team in the country!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Future Walk-On View Post
            Someone will have to agree with me that Butler wasn't expected to do what they did...and they wouldn't be able to do what they did again....they got hot and made a run....they wouldn't beat most of the teams they did consistently....they weren't the 2nd best team in the country!
            OK whatever and Duke was not the best team in America either. Butler had to be considered on of the top 8 teams in the nation last year and with that anything is possible. Who was the top team anyway. I thought playing the games determined that???
            "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
            ??” Thomas Jefferson
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #21
              Sure there is some ISU Fandom in those statements. Those Bulldoggies stopped playing the Sycamores an alternate home & home when they refused to play in the Hulman Center two years ago when it was their turn to play in the Hulman Center resulting in a 100 yr. old series going on the shelf.

              But mark my word or this post or whatever. They will not in the foreseeable future attain the same heights as this past year's team and will struggle mightily next season to even get into the Dance. They would be a regular 3rd or 4th place team in the Valley every year, not a team getting into the dance from a crummy league year after year.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by SFP View Post
                OK whatever and Duke was not the best team in America either. Butler had to be considered on of the top 8 teams in the nation last year and with that anything is possible. Who was the top team anyway. I thought playing the games determined that???
                playing one game in the tournament and winning doesn't prove anything...playing for a chance to make it to their home town to the final four...they were jacked.

                EDIT: Kansas
                Syracuse
                Kansas State
                Villanova
                Duke
                Ohio State
                Michigan State
                West Virginia
                Kentucky

                which of those teams would you put Butler ahead of jw.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by SycamoreFanatic View Post
                  Sure there is some ISU Fandom in those statements. Those Bulldoggies stopped playing the Sycamores an alternate home & home when they refused to play in the Hulman Center two years ago when it was their turn to play in the Hulman Center resulting in a 100 yr. old series going on the shelf.

                  But mark my word or this post or whatever. They will not in the foreseeable future attain the same heights as this past year's team and will struggle mightily next season to even get into the Dance. They would be a regular 3rd or 4th place team in the Valley every year, not a team getting into the dance from a crummy league year after year.
                  I would put money on the fact that no more than 2 teams reach the heights that Butler did last season... So good observation.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bravesfan View Post
                    Nice to see WSU ranked as they should be the favorites for next season. But absolutely ridiculous to see Butler ranked that low! Even without Hayward they should be a top 10 caliber team.

                    Rivals has Butler at 13.


                    Related...

                    All three players that Butler added in 2010 are rated by various services, with two players in the Rivals 150 (Marshall and Hopkins) - (KM is rated by pretty much everyone though) and another (Fromm) who is in the MaxPreps Top 100 (Marshall in there too).

                    Rivals' Brian Snow has said Chrishawn Hopkins is the best athlete in the 2010 class. Here is an example.

                    =========
                    And, why in the world would Butler play Indiana State? Butler doesn't play IUPUI or IPFW either. There is no benefit in playing such programs, outside of a one-off scenario. The level of absurdity in attempting to criticize the schedule of a program that actually played the most difficult OOC-schedule in America, is next level stuff - LOL

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Indy_BB View Post
                      And, why in the world would Butler play Indiana State?
                      Because that's been a yearly series for apparently forever. I don't have means to fact-check that, but if an above post is true, I'd be pretty ticked if a series that has been around for that many years is ended.

                      But in any event, Butler is now Gonzaga. They can get whatever game they want, outside of a marquee name inside Hinkle, and even then they probably can still get a couple. They've ascended.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        College hoops is just crazy - who knows if Butler won't get back to the Final 4 in the next few seasons? Not many teams are as poised as Butler, with a core of young players who play like upper-classmen.
                        Their only disadvantage is playing in the Horizon, which may not prepare them like other teams in better conferences. But other major programs want to play them, just like Gonzaga, because a win vs. them is a quality win, and a loss doesn't hurt them that much. So their non-conf. schedule might get them to play well together quicker than other teams.
                        Anyways, I wouldn't be surprised to see Butler in the Final Four next year or the year after, but they could just as easily lose before the Sweet 16.
                        But the one thing is that they'll hang around in just about every game vs. the Big Boys, and they have an outstanding head coach.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Future Walk-On View Post
                          playing one game in the tournament and winning doesn't prove anything...playing for a chance to make it to their home town to the final four...they were jacked.

                          EDIT: Kansas
                          Syracuse
                          Kansas State
                          Villanova
                          Duke
                          Ohio State
                          Michigan State
                          West Virginia
                          Kentucky

                          which of those teams would you put Butler ahead of jw.
                          Are you letting the names on the front of the jersey effect your thinking.

                          They beat MSU and lost to Duke in a nail biter so are you really serious? Where's UNI on that list? Villanova? They did absolutely nothing the last 1/2 of the season. So to answer your question I'd put Butler ahead of every team except Duke.
                          "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
                          ??” Thomas Jefferson
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Future Walk-On View Post
                            playing one game in the tournament and winning doesn't prove anything...playing for a chance to make it to their home town to the final four...they were jacked.

                            EDIT: Kansas
                            Syracuse
                            Kansas State
                            Villanova
                            Duke
                            Ohio State
                            Michigan State
                            West Virginia
                            Kentucky

                            which of those teams would you put Butler ahead of jw.
                            All of them except MSU and Duke. What exactly has Kentucky done recently? or Villanova? Look at teams not jerseys.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by amckillip View Post
                              All of them except MSU and Duke. What exactly has Kentucky done recently? or Villanova? Look at teams not jerseys.
                              yeah Butler had success.....they got hot at the right time (although they had been hot already rolling through horizon league play). you can't tell me Butler was the 2nd best team in the nation.....that is ridiculous.....

                              you can't tell me UNI was better than Kansas...........

                              EDIT: I am saying over the course of the entire season Butler didn't prove themselves to be better than any of those teams. They beat some teams in one game. They got hot at the right time. I couldn't see that happening again.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Future Walk-On View Post
                                yeah Butler had success.....they got hot at the right time (although they had been hot already rolling through horizon league play). you can't tell me Butler was the 2nd best team in the nation.....that is ridiculous.....

                                you can't tell me UNI was better than Kansas...........
                                Who was better than Butler?? I can tell you that, they won. Kansas consistently underachieves. Kentucky hasn't done anything lately, the last time Villanova was in the Final Four was the same time a George Mason was there and BU was in the sweet sixteen. I'm not sure Butler was the 2nd best team in the nation, I think they might have been #1. Why is it so hard to conceive Butler, a pre-season #9 team wasn't a top tier team at the end of the season? Do we only judge by the provedly flawed recruit rating system that is completely based on the name of the school a kid attends? Or by the number of McDonalds All-Americans, so was UNC the best team last year? How would you determine who the best team is? The infamous eye-test?

                                I'll put it this way, if you were to work for me, and you look good doing something, but don't get results, you're gone. You look ugly but accomplish your goals? You get promoted.

                                Comment

                                Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X