If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
One of the biggest disappointments this year is not seeing AT play much, especially after a solid game vs. EU when TB and WE were racking up the fouls. And then WE and SS not contributing much since then. I like those guys, but WE has been MIA for the past 10 games or so - not going hard to the glass, whereas AT was doing that (when I saw him at least).
Would love to see a bigger rotation. By that I mean that we actually play more than 7 or 8 guys. I just think that to play the type of offense JL likes, we need to get our guys more rest during the game.
I'd go with.....
SM
DD
AW
TB
WE
with
EM
DSE
JE
JP
coming in and giving 3-5 mins each half for sure and then filling in for foul troubles in other places.
other combo that we could go to and switch it up offensively would be.....
DSE @point
SM @ the 2
AW @ the 3
WE
JP
This lineup could give us some size down low for D and than the shooters and athleticism on offense to spread out the other team. I would love to really see WE take more shots from the top of the key and pull out the opposing center.
Some see a hopeless end, while others see an endless hope.
One of the biggest disappointments this year is not seeing AT play much, especially after a solid game vs. EU when TB and WE were racking up the fouls. And then WE and SS not contributing much since then. I like those guys, but WE has been MIA for the past 10 games or so - not going hard to the glass, whereas AT was doing that (when I saw him at least).
AT's stat lines in conference games
@ WSU 1-1 FG, 2-2 FT, 1 defensive rebound, 12 min
vs ISU Blue 0's across the board in 3 min
@MSU 1 defensive rebound, 1 block, 6 min
vs MSU 0's in 1 min
@isu 1-1 FG, 1 offensive rebound, 3 min
@ Evansville 1-3 FG, 3 blocks, 2 fouls, 16 min
I believe we need 3 productive big men to be productive next year. Egolf counts as 1, hopefully Prosser as a second, and we need a third. I hope it can be AT. I think the coaching staff needs to take a close look and determine if that 3rd big is AT or if we need to get a juco that can come in right away or if there is a freshman who could come in and help right away. We might have the best returning guards and wing players in the Valley, but if we want to win anything we need production from our bigs.
Comment