Originally posted by SaintLouBrave22
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Bu 56 WC 54
Collapse
X
-
-
I think they were. They are eligible to play, though to preserve their redshirt option, they probably won't. They knew DD was not going to be on the bench.
BTW- I hope he's feeling OK. He was not at the game, according to a couple people who should have known.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da Coach View PostI think they were. They are eligible to play, though to preserve their redshirt option, they probably won't. They knew DD was not going to be on the bench.
BTW- I hope he's feeling OK. He was not at the game, according to a couple people who should have known.
Comment
-
Great win by BU over an underrated talented team. I predict Illinois will struggle vs Wofford! Great confidence builder for BU to win down the stretch without their best defender DD available to them. Once BU 3 pt guard shooting comes alive vs better teams, BU should be in the driver's seat!
Didn't see the game, tried to follow it on ESPN Game day, but it seemed BU lost their lead in the second half when their jump shooting, and then rebounding, went south. Didn't look like many plays during this time were run through the post, or inside the paint, or any drives to the hoop during this stretch....Was this how it went? Did anyone else notice this?BUilding for the Future
Comment
-
What I saw right around the 8 minute mark or so was a very very quick comeback by Wofford. Bradley was kind of in the driver's seat and then Les subbed in some guys who had trouble, but I think only gave up 3 of the 12 pt lead. Looked like Wofford was starting to get back into it so Les put the TB, WE, CR, AW, and SM or EM (can't remember which) and as I recall (memory is bad) it seemed like about 30 seconds passed and Wofford had converted a bad BU shot and a bad BU turnover into 2 quick threes and were right back in it. Bradley also had a couple of fouls called against them in there, with Wofford taking care of business at the charity stripe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BradleyBrave View PostWe aren't as deep as we thought. No one off the bench can score except for Sam, and I am not sure he'll be coming off the bench much longer."Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
??” Thomas Jefferson
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by SFP View PostLosing DD hurts but I disagree. AT is giving us more then we thought so far, DSE is a man already, CR is CR and I expect to see MK improve throughout the year. So what gives?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AZ BU Fan View PostDidn't look like many plays during this time were run through the post, or inside the paint, or any drives to the hoop during this stretch....Was this how it went? Did anyone else notice this?
Comment
-
My only real complaint yesterday was that we stopped going inside in the last 10 minutes of the game. They had no answer for TB, WE, or even AT down there. Other than that, +8 on the glass is really good, as is our defensive FG%. For that 10 min stretch in the 2nd half we finally were making some shots, and it's amazing how good a team can look when they're making shots. Conversely, it's amazing how bad they can look when they're not.Onward and Upward!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BradleyBrave View PostMy only real complaint yesterday was that we stopped going inside in the last 10 minutes of the game. They had no answer for TB, WE, or even AT down there. Other than that, +8 on the glass is really good, as is our defensive FG%. For that 10 min stretch in the 2nd half we finally were making some shots, and it's amazing how good a team can look when they're making shots. Conversely, it's amazing how bad they can look when they're not.
Comment
-
That's a good observation SLB. Bradley has one speed: full. They always play terribly when they're trying to run the game out. Thing is, while Bradley usually takes a the first good look they get when running their offense, they seem to run at least 20 seconds off the clock on each posession... I think they should just play their game unless they're blowing someone out. We weren't blowing Wofford out yet with 8 minutes left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thefish7 View PostThat's a good observation SLB. Bradley has one speed: full. They always play terribly when they're trying to run the game out. Thing is, while Bradley usually takes a the first good look they get when running their offense, they seem to run at least 20 seconds off the clock on each posession... I think they should just play their game unless they're blowing someone out. We weren't blowing Wofford out yet with 8 minutes left.
Then all of a sudden we're up by 12 and the game is over....with 8 minutes left?
No coach, I don't think so....its WAY too early to start running clock.
As I said before Fish, how do they expect our players to keep it turned up to high when our coach is complacent, apparently has no killer instinct, and is just a-ok with pulling it back with 8 minutes to go?
Comment
-
Well I'm sure Les' intention was not to let Wofford back in the game. If I were a coach in that situation, no problem with slowing tempo a bit to try to control the other team's opportunities on offense... But the slowing of tempo should not equal Maniscalco dribbling around like he's lost it should just discourage him from taking a 3 after 5 seconds have come off the shotclock.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thefish7 View PostWell I'm sure Les' intention was not to let Wofford back in the game. If I were a coach in that situation, no problem with slowing tempo a bit to try to control the other team's opportunities on offense... But the slowing of tempo should not equal Maniscalco dribbling around like he's lost it should just discourage him from taking a 3 after 5 seconds have come off the shotclock.
Why pull back the reigns when the lead could have easily been 20 by the 5 minute mark where you then can ease back a bit?
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment