Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Chicago Eliminated from 2016 Olympics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    I agree to an extent, if real threats are made. But people are entitled to their opinions, no matter how wrong or offensive they are.
    Since blogs are privately owned, how far does the government have a right to go? Should they also be able to police what you say in your own home then?

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Murph View Post
      What do these new FTC regulations have to do with these people and what they are saying?

      It's about fraudulently promoting products....Get a grip people, nobody is going to take your away freedom of speech. I swear the right has gone nuts over the democrats running things, it's your own fault and it's not going to get any better for you guys acting like a bunch of babies that just had their candy taken away.....Are you one of these people screaming...I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK.
      Murph, you don't see what the government is trying to do- they want to intrude on people's privacy. It's that simple, and it is wrong. Liberals used to stand strongly against such things.
      Please stop trying to paint all people who disagree with you as raving lunatics, and babies. That is a time-worn technique that liberals never get tired of.

      Comment


      • #78
        It looks like they are trying to regulate what a former employer of mine liked to do for good publicity. It helped sell the crappier stuff that we had.
        1996 & 2019

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Da Coach View Post
          Murph, you don't see what the government is trying to do- they want to intrude on people's privacy. It's that simple, and it is wrong. Liberals used to stand strongly against such things.
          Please stop trying to paint all people who disagree with you as raving lunatics, and babies. That is a time-worn technique that liberals never get tired of.
          Where were you guys when the Bush administration authorized domestic spying? Thats much more scary than the FTC regulating advertising on blogs.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Chico View Post
            Guess it all depends on which ones you talk to, or say you talk to.
            I have a lot of friends and talk to a lot of people "overseas".
            Bradley 72 - Illini 68 Final

            ???It??™s awful hard,??™??™ said Illini freshman guard D.J. Richardson, the former Central High School guard who played prep school ball a few miles from here and fought back tears outside the locker room. ???It??™s a hometown thing. It??™s bragging rights.??™

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Murph View Post
              What do these new FTC regulations have to do with these people and what they are saying?

              It's about fraudulently promoting products....Get a grip people, nobody is going to take your away freedom of speech. I swear the right has gone nuts over the democrats running things, it's your own fault and it's not going to get any better for you guys acting like a bunch of babies that just had their candy taken away.....Are you one of these people screaming...I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK.
              Murph, I agree with you. I don't know what the big deal is here???????

              Originally posted by Murph View Post
              Where were you guys when the Bush administration authorized domestic spying? Thats much more scary than the FTC regulating advertising on blogs.
              crickets chirping
              Bradley 72 - Illini 68 Final

              ???It??™s awful hard,??™??™ said Illini freshman guard D.J. Richardson, the former Central High School guard who played prep school ball a few miles from here and fought back tears outside the locker room. ???It??™s a hometown thing. It??™s bragging rights.??™

              Comment


              • #82
                So private individuals who blog into their private blogs and do no harm to anyone are the same as terrorists who are avowed to attack the US, kill Americans, and bring down our government? Unbelieveable!

                A private blog is absolutely no different than a private diary, or anything you say or write in the privacy of your own home. The government has no right to legislate what you say.

                I do agree that if you promote violence, or threats against other citizens, then the government should be involved. That was the purpose of the Bush administration's actions, and the majority of Americans agree with it. But legislating opinions about products or reviews of a movie you've seen is unwarranted intrusion.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Da Coach View Post
                  So private individuals who blog into their private blogs and do no harm to anyone are the same as terrorists who are avowed to attack the US, kill Americans, and bring down our government? Unbelieveable!

                  A private blog is absolutely no different than a private diary, or anything you say or write in the privacy of your own home. The government has no right to legislate what you say.

                  I do agree that if you promote violence, or threats against other citizens, then the government should be involved. That was the purpose of the Bush administration's actions, and the majority of Americans agree with it. But legislating opinions about products or reviews of a movie you've seen is unwarranted intrusion.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Da Coach View Post
                    So private individuals who blog into their private blogs and do no harm to anyone are the same as terrorists who are avowed to attack the US, kill Americans, and bring down our government? Unbelieveable!
                    But DC we are not talking about the wiretapping of terrorists who were trying to bring down the government. I am talking about the monitoring of international emails and phone calls, of people inside the United States without court approval!




                    That is far more dangerous to individual freedoms than regulating blogs to protect the consumer against fraudulant products.
                    Bradley 72 - Illini 68 Final

                    ???It??™s awful hard,??™??™ said Illini freshman guard D.J. Richardson, the former Central High School guard who played prep school ball a few miles from here and fought back tears outside the locker room. ???It??™s a hometown thing. It??™s bragging rights.??™

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Murph...domestic spying just saved possibly hundreds maybe thousands of people's lives from the three Islamic terrorists that were plotting to blow up things in Dallas, Springfield, IL, and NY...
                      I for one will allow the govt. to spy all they want if they catch these terrorists.
                      I have nothing to hide, do you?

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Beninator View Post
                        But DC we are not talking about the wiretapping of terrorists who were trying to bring down the government. I am talking about the monitoring of international emails and phone calls, of people inside the United States without court approval!




                        That is far more dangerous to individual freedoms than regulating blogs to protect the consumer against fraudulant products.

                        I can't even imagine the hysteria from to right if the Obama administration tried to do something like that.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by tornado View Post
                          Murph...domestic spying just saved possibly hundreds maybe thousands of people's lives from the three Islamic terrorists that were plotting to blow up things in Dallas, Springfield, IL, and NY...
                          I for one will allow the govt. to spy all they want if they catch these terrorists.
                          I have nothing to hide, do you?
                          T, I am fine with domestic spying as long as it is done with court approval and within the legal limits of established laws! That check and balance is needed.
                          Bradley 72 - Illini 68 Final

                          ???It??™s awful hard,??™??™ said Illini freshman guard D.J. Richardson, the former Central High School guard who played prep school ball a few miles from here and fought back tears outside the locker room. ???It??™s a hometown thing. It??™s bragging rights.??™

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            all -- I REPEAT ALL - governments spy within their own borders...it is an absolute necessity...
                            even when you enter at any border...they require you to submit and allow them to spy on your belongings and even on your own body...at times even making you takes clothes off....as has happened to family members of mine...
                            so maybe if you want to go to a country that is free from any form of spying....check out this place...
                            Not much spying going on here, it's the only place you can feel free

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by tornado View Post
                              Murph...domestic spying just saved possibly hundreds maybe thousands of people's lives from the three Islamic terrorists that were plotting to blow up things in Dallas, Springfield, IL, and NY...
                              I for one will allow the govt. to spy all they want if they catch these terrorists.
                              I have nothing to hide, do you?
                              No, I have nothing to hide and am Ok with what they are doing as long as it isn't abused.

                              Are you planning on defrauding some innocent consumer on your blog?

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                We have never needed big government to police everything we buy and sell before.
                                As it has been for thousands of years, and in every country in the world's history- caveat emptor.

                                Comment

                                Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X