I think the line that can be drawn in the sand over what puts a coach on the hot seat or not is SO situation specific. And today's environment has changed so much. What was acceptable 5-10-20 years ago is (maybe) not tolerated beyond a couple seasons. Perceptions and expectations are so varied (some want postseason every year; some want 100% graduation rates; some want perfect law-abiding citizens; etc).
But I hope things may be shifting a little, and things might become more stable over the next 10 years. Programs wanting a "quick fix" coach who would do "anything" to build a resume isn't gonna be accepted as much - and I will always be proven wrong by the greed and egos of some situations. The Information Age/Era is gonna expose too much. A "Lovable Loser" may not be the desired expectation, but more tolerance of losing (or lack of "success") might be seen as a time for a chance to build stability (and success) in a program.
But I hope things may be shifting a little, and things might become more stable over the next 10 years. Programs wanting a "quick fix" coach who would do "anything" to build a resume isn't gonna be accepted as much - and I will always be proven wrong by the greed and egos of some situations. The Information Age/Era is gonna expose too much. A "Lovable Loser" may not be the desired expectation, but more tolerance of losing (or lack of "success") might be seen as a time for a chance to build stability (and success) in a program.
Comment