• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Illegal Phone Calls

tornado

New member
I just read a very odd statement...
it comes from DePaul's head coach Jerry Wainwright in an article about what the new NCAA Ethics Committe ought to address.

Jerry was talking about the prevalence of top coaches getting caught making illegal phone calls (btw, seems very few of them are being penalized, as Jim Calhoun's case has dropped off the front pages).

Here's what Jerry says...and look at who he unloads on if a coach gets caught making an ILLEGAL PHONE CALL.....he doesn't blame the coach, he blames the recruit!!!
and he also seems to be unloading on the recruits when the coaches give them illegal payments.

Seems to me if this is an NCAA Committee on Ethics, they should be going
after the cheating COACHES...but this isn't apparently what Jerry thinks!


"..for instance, let’s say, the number of phone calls, as an example, if
someone makes illegal number of phone calls because this has gotten
publicity in the last few years. Let’s say someone makes an illegal number of
phone calls, in order to make an illegal phone call, someone has to take it. If,
indeed, people are aware of the fact that this phone call is not legal and they
stay on and they are part of it, aren’t they just as guilty? Right.


and... "if I pay you to come to my school, am I guilty and you’re not? You
took the money. ...Ethics is not a one-way street. It’s not
."


all the other coaches in this interview seem to put the emphasis on the COACHES following the rules and only Jerry ignores the coaches' responsibility and goes after the kids!

Thank goodness for guys in the profession like Dane Fife who say this about unscrupulous coaches...
"a rule’s a rule and they are expected to be followed (by the coaches)."
http://www.annarbor.com/sports/a-mo...college-basketball-coaches-would-like-to-see/
 
In a way I agree. Yes in his comments he is ignoring the coach's responsibility, but I think he's just trying to bring the attention on the recruit also. He's not denying the coach's guilt, he's merely expressing his opinion that the recruits should be held accountable as well as the coach, and I agree. It is a two way steet, not a one way, and it would happen a lot less often if the kids started to step up with their ethics also.
 
I suspect the kids cannot possibly know all the rules...they are not sent to seminars about the NCAA's rules and do not have compliance experts working for them and taking classes from the NCAA on what's right and what's wrong.
Plus if the phone rings from the coach, is the kid supposed to see the incoming phone number, automatically know who is it and NOT answer it??
The instant he answers the phone, according to Wainwright then he's guilty!
Remember...it is NOT a violation if the kid calls the coach, only when the coach initiates the call...putting way, way more burden of responsibility on the coach.

Anyway...the NCAA has NO enforcement powers over high schoolers, but they sure do over the coaches....so Wainwright is just trying to deflect the guilt here and protect his buddy Jim Calhoun.
 
Back
Top