Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Next year's recruit? We only have 1 left!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by brocks View Post
    Bringing in Prosser, Knezevic, Harris, Wilkins the next 2 years. Not sure where the "bigs" problem is here. This coming seson, the only way I'd worry is if AT, JP, and MK are all busts and WE's near break-out sophomore season proves to have been an illusion. A lot has to go wrong for BU to have no inside game from here on out. And I think we're due some luck from the basketball gods.
    Knezevic isn't a big...at least in the sense that I don't think you'll see him contributing much as an inside player...especially as a freshman. I would assume that any success he will have as a frosh will be from the perimeter.
    But I do agree with you...I think we will be OK as far as our bigs are concerned next year. I think some combination of Egolf, Prosser, Singh, and Thompson will find a way to provide production for us that will be better than what we got this year...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by ER3 View Post
      Knezevic isn't a big...at least in the sense that I don't think you'll see him contributing much as an inside player...especially as a freshman. I would assume that any success he will have as a frosh will be from the perimeter.
      But I do agree with you...I think we will be OK as far as our bigs are concerned next year. I think some combination of Egolf, Prosser, Singh, and Thompson will find a way to provide production for us that will be better than what we got this year...
      And we can't gorget Taylor Brown, too. That kid could be special.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by brocks View Post
        A lot has to go wrong for BU to have no inside game from here on out. And I think we're due some luck from the basketball gods.
        I think a lot of us are simply lumping BIG players into the same category as whoever will play our 5-spot. Because they've generally been the same... our biggest guys have played the 5 (obviously).

        I think we're set on BIG players, we just need a capable center for the future. We have mostly PFs who can play center if needed. Would obviously love to see a 7 footer, but even a 6'9 true center will work great. With the size we have coming in, we'll be able to play some tall guys at the 3 and 4 (AW, MK, CR, JP, SH...)

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by jeffsu View Post
          I think a lot of us are simply lumping BIG players into the same category as whoever will play our 5-spot. Because they've generally been the same... our biggest guys have played the 5 (obviously).

          I think we're set on BIG players, we just need a capable center for the future. We have mostly PFs who can play center if needed. Would obviously love to see a 7 footer, but even a 6'9 true center will work great. With the size we have coming in, we'll be able to play some tall guys at the 3 and 4 (AW, MK, CR, JP, SH...)
          Exactly! If AT does not step up we'll only have WE as a 5 and he's really a 4. We have a bunch of PF's which is great but I want a legitimate 5 and it never hurts to have a young backup for those needed minutes and learning to become the seasoned veteran down the road.
          "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
          ??” Thomas Jefferson
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by tornado View Post
            so maybe we should have signed only half of them and been thin in the backcourt?
            Maybe one third.

            Comment


            • #21
              I BIG doesn't have to be all that tall anyway.....would anyone take Eric Coleman or heck even that guy from UWM. Granted these guys were wide bodies vs being 6'9" + but a space eater can be very effective.

              SS would be fine IF he had a tad bit more offensive skills or some more athleticism.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by brocks View Post
                And we can't gorget Taylor Brown, too. That kid could be special.
                Yeah, I only left taylor out because i was talking about guys that could conceivably get minutes at center next year...
                Taylor has a chance to be really, really good if he can develop a little better midrange game on offense. He already is the best natural rebounder we have on our team, and he has a "nose for the ball" that is second to none.
                Get a little stronger, improve his midrange jumper a little, and he can be a huge, huge contributor from the 4 spot for us for the next 3 years...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by ER3 View Post
                  Yeah, I only left taylor out because i was talking about guys that could conceivably get minutes at center next year...
                  Taylor has a chance to be really, really good if he can develop a little better midrange game on offense. He already is the best natural rebounder we have on our team, and he has a "nose for the ball" that is second to none.
                  Get a little stronger, improve his midrange jumper a little, and he can be a huge, huge contributor from the 4 spot for us for the next 3 years...

                  Wouldn't TB be a better 3....ideally having him there...WE at 4 and AT the 5. I said IDEALLY becuase I hope but am not expecting, sadly, for AT to fill the 5.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by georgethedog View Post
                    Maybe one third.
                    I've read that JW can play point if needed. 1/3 point, 1/3 shooting guard, 1/3 PF!
                    "Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
                    ??” Thomas Jefferson
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by ER3 View Post
                      Yeah, I only left taylor out because i was talking about guys that could conceivably get minutes at center next year...
                      Taylor has a chance to be really, really good if he can develop a little better midrange game on offense. He already is the best natural rebounder we have on our team, and he has a "nose for the ball" that is second to none.
                      Get a little stronger, improve his midrange jumper a little, and he can be a huge, huge contributor from the 4 spot for us for the next 3 years...
                      I was very impressed by a late-season comment from TB that he realized that he needed to get a lot stronger for D1 (and sounded very willing to work hard on adding strength)

                      I really, really hope he gets major minutes at the 4 (sure 3 would be great, I hoped MS would be played more as a 3 too, but based on our history, it'll be a 3)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I hope are bigs are fine next year but there should be a little cause for concern.
                        WE- hopefully he comes back 100% but even if he is he still has really only played significant minutes in 3 or 4 games in his career. He looked like he had potential but so did David Collins.
                        JP- freshman, will he really be able to contribute 15-20 minutes next year? i hope but clearly not a given
                        SS- he is what he is, should be a backup at beast on any team trying to win a conference title. I like SS but he isnt a guy that will put a eam over the top but should get some minutes and shoul contribute
                        MK- sounds like hes not a true big, more of a 3 or 4 type player who can create matchup problems/
                        AT- will he ever get off the bench? Obviously hes behind the depth chart of SS and WE should how can we expect him to do anything this year
                        TB- not a true big but hopefully can pick up some of the slack from TW next year. I hope for him to give us 8-10 ppg and 5-7 rpg and be ready to start hopefully.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          why do people think that TB can effectively play the 3? So far we have seen no 3-pt shooting from him, something I think he doesn't have. TB will always be a 4, a body inside hitting the boards, getting dunks, and using the mid-range shot to his advantage. An effective SF or 3 needs to be able to shoot a good % from beyond the arc.
                          Thinking is the hardest work, that is why so few people do it. -Henry Ford

                          Yeah...I've been in college for a while now and I'm pretty sure that awesomest is not a word. -Andrew E.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Stryker View Post
                            why do people think that TB can effectively play the 3? So far we have seen no 3-pt shooting from him, something I think he doesn't have. TB will always be a 4, a body inside hitting the boards, getting dunks, and using the mid-range shot to his advantage. An effective SF or 3 needs to be able to shoot a good % from beyond the arc.
                            I really like TB at the 4. He has a lot of potential. I like his size, quickness, ability to rebound well, (and maybe his mid-range shot).

                            I will really miss TW next year but I hope TB steps up big.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by MacabreMob View Post
                              I really like TB at the 4. He has a lot of potential. I like his size, quickness, ability to rebound well, (and maybe his mid-range shot).

                              I will really miss TW next year but I hope TB steps up big.
                              My thoughts exactly! TB needs to fill that role and I have a feeling he'll do just fine. It'll be like having TW around for four years!
                              ???People say, ???Forget last year', but I want our guys to remember that one, because that will not happen again. We will be much better.??? Geno Ford, 9/22/12

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Stryker View Post
                                why do people think that TB can effectively play the 3? So far we have seen no 3-pt shooting from him, something I think he doesn't have. TB will always be a 4, a body inside hitting the boards, getting dunks, and using the mid-range shot to his advantage. An effective SF or 3 needs to be able to shoot a good % from beyond the arc.
                                Also, a "3" would ideally have better handles.

                                Comment

                                Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X