Roster turnover is always a big part of the college game. Besides the obvious need to replace graduating seniors, a large number of programs must deal with players transfering or leaving school for various reason. The question, of course, is how much roster turnover is too much?
Wednesday's announcement that Darrian Norris will transfer to a differnt school is just the latest in a long line of players leaving Bradley. In the last 5 years (since the end of the 2004-05 season), Bradley has had 9 players leave the Hilltop with eligibility remaining (Stemler, Rembert, O'Bryant, Brown, Jassey, Fears, Cole-Scott, Austin, and Norris). Now, I don't know the numbers when it comes to other schools, but I'm willing to bet that 9 is at least above the national average. It should also be noted that it wouldn't necessarily be a shock if that number climbed to 10 before next season gets under way.
It's tough to say just how much these deflections have set back the Braves. Each of the players on that list left for different reasons and there's really no way to say how much differently things would have turned out if any of them have stayed. I don't think the number of players leaving has reached a point that it's really a problem, but it does concern me a little. Norris may not have been in line for much playing time next season, but he still showed a lot of promise and would likely have had a good shot at contributing during his junior and senior years.
In my mind, it just raises a couple of questions. When does a constant string of players leaving early become a problem that hurts program success and stability? And is there anything the coaching staff can do differently to stop this from happening (e.i. perhaps be more clear to recruits about what roles they can expect to fill)?
Wednesday's announcement that Darrian Norris will transfer to a differnt school is just the latest in a long line of players leaving Bradley. In the last 5 years (since the end of the 2004-05 season), Bradley has had 9 players leave the Hilltop with eligibility remaining (Stemler, Rembert, O'Bryant, Brown, Jassey, Fears, Cole-Scott, Austin, and Norris). Now, I don't know the numbers when it comes to other schools, but I'm willing to bet that 9 is at least above the national average. It should also be noted that it wouldn't necessarily be a shock if that number climbed to 10 before next season gets under way.
It's tough to say just how much these deflections have set back the Braves. Each of the players on that list left for different reasons and there's really no way to say how much differently things would have turned out if any of them have stayed. I don't think the number of players leaving has reached a point that it's really a problem, but it does concern me a little. Norris may not have been in line for much playing time next season, but he still showed a lot of promise and would likely have had a good shot at contributing during his junior and senior years.
In my mind, it just raises a couple of questions. When does a constant string of players leaving early become a problem that hurts program success and stability? And is there anything the coaching staff can do differently to stop this from happening (e.i. perhaps be more clear to recruits about what roles they can expect to fill)?
Comment