Originally posted by braveatheart
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Better road team...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BradleyBrave View PostThe numbers speak for themselves. By year 7 with Mo, we had 3 20+ win seasons, several NITs, a conference title, an NCAA appearance, a winning conference record, a couple undefeated home seasons, an NBA 1st round pick, and a higher overall winning percentage. We had several all-conference players (year-end), and even a Coach of the Year award. In year 7 of this regime, we have 3 20 win seasons (although it took 37 games to get the 3rd one), zero conference titles (zero top 3 finishes), a near-record number of home losses last season, a losing overall conference record, an NCAA appearance, and an NBA lottery pick. I don't believe we've had any 1st team all-conference players (year-end), and certainly no COY awards.
I don't want to split hairs, and I am not longing for the days of Molinari to return. But I don't think our talent is any better than it was back then, nor do I think we've performed any better. The numbers back this up. Swagger is all fine and good, but it doesn't win basketball games.
I, like you, do not want to go back to the Mo days. However, the records speak loudly about his success and with the exception of the Sweet 16 run, Mo HAS had more success than Les so far. I always wonder what would have happened if Mo would have been able to stay with Granger and that recruiting class?
Comment
-
Originally posted by georgethedog View PostI, like you, do not want to go back to the Mo days. However, the records speak loudly about his success and with the exception of the Sweet 16 run, Mo HAS had more success than Les so far. I always wonder what would have happened if Mo would have been able to stay with Granger and that recruiting class?Onward and Upward!
Comment
-
I for one would take the one Sweet 16 appearance over anything Bradley accomplished under Mo. A conference title, a player of the year, a coach of the year or any other petty accolade means nothing if you don't make it to or win at the Big Dance. If I was a recruit and I was evaluating my options for college, I would be more interested in hearing Sweet 16 participant than conference titles. Maybe thats just my opinion, and I know Bradley has only been to one under the Jim Les era, but one is better than none. I felt like every road game was unwinnable under Molinari. He had tons of talent and didn't utilize it IMO. That one NCAA tournament appearance and loss to Stanford was heartbreaking. The one NCAA appearance with victories over national powerhouse Kansas and then Pittsburgh is a priceless memory that I will always cherish as a Bradley fan. Thanks Coach Les!!!!!Go small or go home!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BradleyBrave View PostI am fully confident that had Mo been given 1 or 2 more years, we would have won at least 1 conference title and made at least 1 or 2 NCAA's. But, that's hindsight at this point. People wanted change and that's what they got, regardless of how inexperienced the new leader was. Sounds kind of familiar, doesn't it?
BU men's basketball is the only revenue-producing sport among the 13 varsity sports (6 men's and 7 women's) that Bradley has. They have to protect the revenue stream that basketball provides; without it, Bradley would have a difficult time fielding enough teams to qualify for NCAA Division 1.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment