Originally posted by squirrel
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Is SEMO a threat?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by squirrel View PostBU lost to SEMO in 2000, and many used that loss to accelerate the Molinari firing process. Nevermind SEMO was an NCAA Tournament team that nearly beat LSU in the tournament.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squirrel View PostBU lost to SEMO in 2000, and many used that loss to accelerate the Molinari firing process. Nevermind SEMO was an NCAA Tournament team that nearly beat LSU in the tournament.Originally posted by MacabreMob View PostHonestly - I don't recall THAT being the thing accelerating Mo's firing process.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MacabreMob View PostI also wanna add... that loss was in December of 1999. Mo got fired after in 2002. 2 1/2 years later. So a loss in Dec of 1999 accelerated the process to get him fired 2 1/2 years later.... and we can look back to THAT game as the thing that accelerated it.
And then 2001, he failed to win the tourney and then there was the Detroit NIT debacle.
And then in his final year, the early season UT-Arlington and LA-La losses pretty much sealed the deal.
Those three points I firmly believe led to Mo bleeding in the water and ultimately feeding the sharks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MacabreMob View PostI also wanna add... that loss was in December of 1999. Mo got fired after in 2002. 2 1/2 years later. So a loss in Dec of 1999 accelerated the process to get him fired 2 1/2 years later.... and we can look back to THAT game as the thing that accelerated it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squirrel View PostIt most certainly did. Most viewed it as an inexcusable loss.
And then 2001, he failed to win the tourney and then there was the Detroit NIT debacle.
And then in his final year, the early season UT-Arlington and LA-La losses pretty much sealed the deal.
Those three points I firmly believe led to Mo bleeding in the water and ultimately feeding the sharks.Onward and Upward!
Comment
-
Originally posted by squirrel View PostIt most certainly did. Most viewed it as an inexcusable loss.
And then 2001, he failed to win the tourney and then there was the Detroit NIT debacle.
And then in his final year, the early season UT-Arlington and LA-La losses pretty much sealed the deal.
Those three points I firmly believe led to Mo bleeding in the water and ultimately feeding the sharks.
I guess I thought more of SEMO that season and they went on to tie for 1st in the OVC and win the auto-bid over Murray St in a thriller (I sorta recall). You already mentioned how well they played in the NCAA tourney.
I am surprised SO MANY viewed it as an inexcusable loss. But then again... if the views were collected from the other board back then, well... how is it I am not surprised anymore.
Comment
-
My humble opinion of why Mo lost his job was because of money. There were consistently less fannies in the seats (regardless of the season ticket numbers). I think there was less money coming into the Braves club from donations for raffle tickets, luncheons, golf outing etc. etc. Sure things like wins and losses, style of play, perception of recruiting etc. etc. all count, but my opinion is that at the end of the day he lost his job because of the almighty dollar. When people with money want a change, change usually happens."Let's make some noise".
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment